Miro gives teams a shared canvas for brainstorming, diagrams, workshops, product planning, and presentations. Its Intelligent Canvas supports structured formats such as Tables and Timelines, while Miro AI can organize ideas and generate diagrams from existing board content. Teams exploring alternatives often need something more connected to their existing work. Some want workshop facilitation controls, others need whiteboards inside Microsoft Teams, and product teams may prefer to turn brainstorming notes directly into tracked tasks or design files.
Common reasons to look for a Miro alternative
Your workshops rely on private idea collection, guided facilitation, and controls that prevent participants from moving important instructions.
Your organization conducts most collaborative meetings in Microsoft Teams and wants whiteboards managed within its Microsoft 365 environment.
Your designers need brainstorming sessions closely connected to interface components, prototypes, and developer handoff.
You want workshop ideas to become assigned tasks within the same work management system, without relying on separate project integrations.
You need to distinguish persistent project boards from Miro Lite's temporary whiteboards, which are deleted after 24 hours.
Ranked by Overall Score: our Editor Rating and Market Signal, 50/50. Market Signal uses Ahrefs and Semrush data through September 2026, pulled October 6 to 17, 2026. How we score
Why choose it: ClickUp works for teams that want to turn whiteboard discussions into assigned work immediately, with tasks and project documents available on the same canvas.
Strengths
• Sticky notes, text boxes, and shapes can become ClickUp tasks.
• Existing tasks and Docs can be added and edited inside Whiteboards.
• Whiteboard connections visually link ideas with tasks and related information.
Limitations
• Tasks and Docs are excluded when exporting a Whiteboard.
• Whiteboard availability and usage limits depend on edition and user role.
• Its whiteboards sit inside ClickUp's task management structure.
From $16 per full seat/mo (annual billing)Free plan
Why choose it: Product designers who brainstorm in FigJam and then develop interactive interfaces in Figma Design can keep early discussions closer to their design components and prototypes.
Strengths
• FigJam supports collaborative sticky notes, diagrams, and group brainstorming.
• Voting sessions hide participants' choices until results are revealed.
• Widgets add interactive polls, calendars, mind maps, and imported data.
Limitations
• Starting FigJam voting sessions needs a file belonging to a paid team.
• The FigJam timer can't be restricted to a single facilitator.
• Design prototypes and developer handoff use Figma's design tools, not FigJam alone.
From $9.99 per member/mo (annual billing)Free plan
Why choose it: Mural is worth examining when a facilitator needs participants to contribute privately before discussing ideas and wants tighter control over what people can move or see during a workshop.
Strengths
• Private Mode hides participants' contributions until the facilitator ends the activity.
• Summon Participants brings attendees to the same canvas location.
• Super Lock prevents participants from changing facilitator-controlled board objects.
Limitations
• Its documented work centers on visual collaboration and workshop facilitation.
• Teams moving Miro Tables or Timelines should verify the corresponding Mural workflow.
• Facilitation permissions differ from ordinary editing permissions.
Why choose it: Software teams documenting decisions in Confluence and tracking implementation in Jira can use Confluence Whiteboards to turn workshop notes into Jira work items.
Strengths
• Sticky notes and shapes can be converted into Jira work items.
• Existing Jira work items can be imported onto whiteboards.
• Whiteboards can be embedded in Jira, Confluence, and Trello using Smart Links.
Limitations
• Confluence Whiteboards aren't available in Atlassian Government environments.
• Jira work item conversion requires access to the corresponding Jira site and project.
• Its documented task connections center on Atlassian products.
Why choose it: Microsoft Whiteboard makes sense for organizations running workshops directly in Teams meetings, particularly when participants use digital pens, touchscreens, or Microsoft 365 accounts.
Strengths
• Teams meetings can open and share collaborative Whiteboard canvases.
• Inking tools include shape recognition, arrows, highlighters, and adjustable pens.
• Follow mode directs attendees' attention to the presenter's location.
Limitations
• External collaboration depends on Microsoft 365 administrator settings.
• Read-only mode is restricted to whiteboards initiated within Teams meetings or channels.
• Its documented workflow doesn't establish equivalents for Miro's structured Tables and Timelines.
Why choose it: For workshops that split participants into smaller working groups before bringing their ideas together, Lucidspark provides dedicated Breakout Boards and voting sessions.
Strengths
• Breakout Boards divide participants into separate brainstorming spaces connected to a main board.
• Voting sessions collect participant choices and display results for group discussion.
• Lucid Cards organize ideas and action items on collaborative boards.
Limitations
• Breakout Boards need the Enterprise edition.
• Voting session creation requires Team or Enterprise access.
• Breakout Boards have a documented limit of 50 per parent board.
Which Miro alternative is closest for collaborative workshops?⌄
Mural and Lucidspark are worth comparing first. Mural provides Private Mode, facilitator permissions, Super Lock, and tools for directing attention during meetings. Lucidspark offers voting and Enterprise Breakout Boards for dividing larger groups into smaller working sessions. Miro already supports timers and voting, so the deciding question is how each product handles your particular workshop format, especially anonymous contributions, breakout activities, and permissions.
Can I migrate my Miro boards to another whiteboard?⌄
Begin by identifying the boards that need to remain editable. Miro supports board exports, but an image or PDF preserves visual content without necessarily preserving editable sticky notes, connectors, or structured objects. Review the destination vendor's supported imports before exporting. Rebuild important links, task connections, and facilitation settings where necessary. Keep the original boards accessible until diagrams, text, and permissions have been checked in the replacement.
Should a product design team use FigJam or Miro?⌄
FigJam is relevant when brainstorming directly supports work in Figma Design. Teams can discuss flows, vote on ideas, and bring design components into collaborative sessions. Miro also supports diagrams, wireframes, and integrations with Figma, but its workspace covers additional planning formats such as Tables, Timelines, and interactive presentations. Consider where the design files live and how product managers, engineers, and designers exchange information after a workshop.
Which alternative connects brainstorming with project management?⌄
ClickUp and Confluence offer two different approaches. ClickUp Whiteboards let teams create or edit ClickUp tasks and Docs while arranging ideas on a canvas. Confluence Whiteboards connect directly with Jira, allowing sticky notes to become work items and existing issues to appear on the board. If your organization already tracks projects in one of those systems, examine how the whiteboard handles task ownership, updates, and project permissions.
