Skip to content
SEM Solutions
Wrike logo

Best Wrike Alternatives

Overall Score71/100
4.6Editor Rating
Market Signal 52

Wrike handles work intake, project delivery, creative proofing, and resource allocation in one system. Its dynamic request forms can route incoming briefs, while approval tools keep comments and asset versions attached to the job. That setup isn't every team's preferred starting point. Some need company goals tied directly to projects, spreadsheets that operations staff already understand, developer backlogs, or clearer links between client work, tracked hours, and profit.

Common reasons to look for a Wrike alternative

  • A team organized around company objectives may want projects and portfolios linked explicitly to measurable goals, not only delivery dashboards.
  • Creative request forms and asset approvals can add process overhead when the team mostly needs shared task lists and conversations.
  • Software developers using sprint commitments, epics, and release versions may prefer those objects at the center of daily planning.
  • Agencies that invoice clients need billable-hour reporting and project margins alongside task progress.
  • Operations teams already comfortable with rows and formulas might prefer sheet-based workflows to Wrike's custom item structure.

Wrike and its alternatives at a glance

ToolStarting priceFree planMarket SignalBuilt for
Wrike logoWrike(current)$10 per user/mo (annual billing)Yes52 / 100Solo, Small Business, Enterprise
Asana logoAsana$10.99 per user/mo (annual billing)Yes72 / 100Small Business, Mid-Market, Enterprise
ClickUp logoClickUp$7 per user/mo (annual billing)Yes64 / 100Freelancer, Small Business, Mid-Market, Enterprise
monday.com logomonday.com$9 per seat/mo (annual billing)Yes62 / 100Solo, Small Business, Enterprise
Jira logoJira$7.91 per user/moYes50 / 100Solo, Small Business, Enterprise
Smartsheet logoSmartsheet$9 per member/mo (annual billing)No67 / 100Solo, Small Business, Enterprise
Teamwork logoTeamworkSee pricingYes43 / 100Enterprise

Ranked by Overall Score: our Editor Rating and Market Signal, 50/50. Market Signal uses Ahrefs and Semrush data through September 2026, pulled October 6 to 17, 2026. How we score

Asana logo

Asana

Overall Score82/100
4.7Editor Rating
Market Signal 72
From $10.99 per user/mo (annual billing)Free plan

Why choose it: Asana makes sense when leadership wants individual projects mapped to company goals and monitored together in portfolios.

Strengths

  • • Goals connect strategic objectives to supporting work.
  • • Portfolios consolidate project status and progress reporting.
  • • Workload views help managers spot uneven assignments.

Limitations

  • • Creative file proofing is not the center of the portfolio workflow.
  • • Goal and portfolio access varies by subscription tier.
ClickUp logo

ClickUp

Overall Score80/100
4.9Editor Rating
Market Signal 64
From $7 per user/mo (annual billing)Free plan

Why choose it: ClickUp suits teams that want project tasks, editable documents, and team chat in the same workspace.

Strengths

  • • Docs link working notes and specifications to tasks.
  • • Chat conversations can connect directly with related work.
  • • Project views accommodate different ways of tracking delivery.

Limitations

  • • Combining chat, documents, and tasks creates more workspace settings to govern.
  • • Some chat and AI capabilities have separate access requirements.
monday.com logo

monday.com

Overall Score77/100
4.7Editor Rating
Market Signal 62
From $9 per seat/mo (annual billing)Free plan

Why choose it: Teams that build intake and handoff flows around highly configurable boards may find monday.com work management easier to shape.

Strengths

  • • Board columns accommodate different operational records and statuses.
  • • No-code recipes send reminders, assign owners, and create tasks.
  • • Dashboards combine information from several boards.

Limitations

  • • Complex dependencies across many boards need careful setup.
  • • Automation capacity and functionality depend on the selected product and tier.
Jira logo

Jira

Overall Score73/100
4.8Editor Rating
Market Signal 50
From $7.91 per user/moFree plan

Why choose it: Jira fits development teams planning releases through prioritized backlogs, epics, sprints, and tracked issues.

Strengths

  • • Scrum backlog ranks stories and assigns work to sprints.
  • • Versions and epics organize release delivery.
  • • Automation rules connect issue changes with developer tools.

Limitations

  • • Scrum terminology can complicate nontechnical creative requests.
  • • Global automation rules require appropriate administrator permissions.
Smartsheet logo

Smartsheet

Overall Score65/100
3.6Editor Rating
Market Signal 67
From $9 per member/mo (annual billing)Free trial

Why choose it: Smartsheet is a natural candidate for PMOs tracking repeatable programs with familiar grid data and portfolio reporting.

Strengths

  • • Grid-based planning supports structured project data.
  • • Dashboards summarize information across project sheets.
  • • Automated workflows can route updates and approvals.

Limitations

  • • A grid-first workflow is less natural for conversational team coordination.
  • • Advanced portfolio governance needs additional configuration.
Teamwork logo

Teamwork

Overall Score57/100
3.8Editor Rating
Market Signal 43
See pricingFree plan

Why choose it: For agencies billing clients, Teamwork connects the delivery schedule with time entries, project budgets, and profitability.

Strengths

  • • Tracked time distinguishes billable from nonbillable work.
  • • Project profitability reporting links delivery with financial performance.
  • • Client-specific project views support external collaboration.

Limitations

  • • Its client-finance focus may be unnecessary for internal operations.
  • • Time and financial reports need reliable team time entry.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which Wrike alternative is closest for cross-functional project management?⌄

Asana and monday.com are sensible starting points, but they solve slightly different problems. Asana connects portfolios of projects to goals, which helps teams report on strategic commitments. monday.com centers much of its work around configurable boards and automation recipes. Compare your actual intake, approval, and reporting flows before deciding which resembles your Wrike setup.

Can a team move existing Wrike projects into another tool?⌄

Usually, but plan for manual checking. Start by exporting a representative set of Wrike tasks and reviewing what your destination accepts through its import process or API. Test assignees, dates, dependencies, custom fields, attachments, and comments separately. Request forms and proof annotations aren't ordinary task fields, so record their logic and archive approval history before switching.

Should a software development team choose Jira instead of Wrike?⌄

Jira is worth considering if engineers plan work in Scrum backlogs, assign stories to sprints, organize epics, and monitor versions. Wrike can track technical projects, but its documented strengths include broader work intake and creative review. If marketing and engineering share a system today, test whether a Jira-centered process still gives nontechnical colleagues the visibility they need.

Which alternative makes more sense for a client-service agency?⌄

Teamwork deserves a close look if your agency needs to connect tasks with billable hours and project profitability. Wrike includes intake and proofing tools useful for campaigns and creative work; Teamwork places explicit attention on client budgets, tracked time, and financial reports. If approvals on images and videos are central, compare those workflows in detail before moving.

Written by SEM Solutions Editorial Team

Last updated October 21, 2026

Last updated: October 21, 2026